From av282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Mon Apr  1 20:59:47 EST 1996
Article: 163794 of alt.religion.scientology
Path: casaba.srv.cs.cmu.edu!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!nott!cunews!freenet-news.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!av282
From: av282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Martin G. V. Hunt)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Session data confidential?
Date: 24 Mar 1996 12:14:42 GMT
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Lines: 17
Sender: av282@freenet3.carleton.ca (Martin G. V. Hunt)
Message-ID: <4j3ebi$i83@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
Reply-To: av282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Martin G. V. Hunt)
NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet3.carleton.ca

So it's confidential?  Explain this: I faked F/Ns by gently squeezing
and relaxing the cans, but later confessed to it in another session
flying ruds before the end of endless int rundown.  Explain why my ass
was hauled into Ethics for it.  If it was confidential session data,
how did Ethics get wind of it?  Two people I barely knew were poring
over the session data open in front of them.  What, was the MAA at
ASHO out-tech?  Bullshit.  Standard procedure.  Truth is, there isn't
any confidentiality to session data.  Don't believe it?  Mention a 
"crime" of some kind, false attest, theft, hiding something, whatever.
See how fast you end up in ethics trouble.  So fast it'll make your head
spin.


--
Cogito, ergo sum.   "Most [Scientology buildings] look more like places where 
you could get "mother" tattoed on your buttocks than places that sell the 
ultimate secrets of the universe." -- Chris Schafmeister.